My ongoing thing for smart women

My ongoing thing for smart women

I am a mad scientist. Because I am successful at it, "they" call me an entrepreneur. I turn science fiction into science fact. I have many facets. I am fascinated with intelligence, tattoos and beautiful women. I build companies and am a leader of men. I have a dark side that I explore in a controlled manner. I enjoy participating in combat sports and other rough distractions. I produce and promote the use of green technology. I both love and hate humanity. I think we are in a failing system because it produces leaders that are the most popular of the average; who wants that? If you have stumbled upon this blog and are under 18 years, leave now and wash your eyes out with soap.

Sorry Ladies - from all malekind

5 Ways Modern Men Are Trained to Hate Women

March 27, 2012 889,823 views

If you’re not the type to keep up with ugly, soul-killing political controversies, let me catch you up: A while back, hugely popular political commentator Rush Limbaugh lost a bunch of advertisers because he publicly called a college girl a slut and a prostitute after she suggested that health insurance plans should cover birth control. But he’s paid to say outrageous things. If you really want to feel all dead inside, you need to listen to what the regular folk were saying.

For instance, on crazy political message board FreeRepublic.com, posters referred to the girl in the above-referenced story (Sandra Fluke) as a “Nasty, disease-ridden plodding uterus, an utter skank crack-ho filthy whore, a prostitute slutbag juice-receptacle” and a “Sperm-burpin’ gutter slut,” and said she “… is so encrusted and used, that I had to throw out my flat-panel TV because her appearance on my TV infected it with AIDS, gonorrhea and syphilis.” There are many, many more worse comments collected here and here and here.

Now go to the front page of any mostly male discussion site like Reddit.com and see how many inches you can browse before finding several thousand men bemoaning how all women are gold-digging whores (7,500 upvotes) and how crazy and irrational women are (9,659 upvotes) and how horrible and gross and fat women are (4,000 upvotes). Or browse the “Men’s Rights” section and see weird fantasies about alpha males defeating all the hot women who try to control them with their vaginas.

This current of white-hot rage has to come as a surprise to some of you, because we tend to think “sexism” is being dismissive toward women, or paying them lower salaries — we don’t think of it as frenzied “burn the witch!” hatred. Yet occasionally something like this Limbaugh thing will come along to prick that balloon, and out it pours. Like it’s always waiting there, a millimeter below the surface.

Why? Well, you see …

#5. We Were Told That Society Owed Us a Hot Girl

Photos.com

Does it seem like men feel kind of entitled to sex? Does it seem like we react to rejection with the maturity of a child being denied a toy?

Well, you have to keep in mind that what we learn as kids is really hard to deprogram as an adult. And what we learned as kids is that we males are each owed, and will eventually be awarded, a beautiful woman.

Photos.com
“Surprise! Just a little something for graduation.”

We were told this by every movie, TV show, novel, comic book, video game and song we encountered. When the Karate Kid wins the tournament, his prize is a trophy and Elisabeth Shue. Neo saves the world and is awarded Trinity. Marty McFly gets his dream girl, John McClane gets his ex-wife back, Keanu “Speed” Reeves gets Sandra Bullock, Shia LaBeouf gets Megan Fox in Transformers, Iron Man gets Pepper Potts, the hero in Avatar gets the hottest Na’vi, Shrek gets Fiona, Bill Murray gets Sigourney Weaver in Ghostbusters, Frodo gets Sam, WALL-E gets EVE … and so on.

Hell, at the end of An Officer and a Gentleman, Richard Gere walks into the lady’s workplace and just carries her out like he’s picking up a suit at the dry cleaner.


“I’ll take the one in brown flannel. I don’t need a bag.”

And then we have Star Wars, where Luke starts out getting Princess Leia (in The Empire Strikes Back), but then as Han Solo became a fan favorite, George Lucas realized he had to award her to him instead (forcing him to write the “She’s secretly Luke’s sister” thing into Return of the Jedi, even though it meant adding the weird incest vibe to Empire). With Harry Potter, J.K. Rowling played with the convention by having the beautiful girl get awarded to the sidekick character Ron, but she made it a central conflict in the story that Ron is constantly worried that, since Harry is the main character, Hermione will be awarded to him instead.

In each case, the woman has no say in this — compatibility doesn’t matter, prior relationships don’t matter, nothing else factors in. If the hero accomplishes his goals, he is awarded his favorite female. Yes, there will be dialogue that maybe makes it sound like the woman is having doubts, and she will make noises like she is making the decision on her own. But we, as the audience, know that in the end the hero will “get the girl,” just as we know that at the end of the month we’re going to “get our paycheck.” Failure to award either is breaking a societal contract. The girl can say what she wants, but we all know that at the end, she will wind up with the hero, whether she knows it or not.


“Wait right there. I need to go defeat my demons and realize the strength was in me all along.”

And now you see the problem. From birth we’re taught that we’re owed a beautiful girl. We all think of ourselves as the hero of our own story, and we all (whether we admit it or not) think we’re heroes for just getting through our day.

So it’s very frustrating, and I mean frustrating to the point of violence, when we don’t get what we’re owed. A contract has been broken. These women, by exercising their own choices, are denying it to us. It’s why every Nice Guy is shocked to find that buying gifts for a girl and doing her favors won’t win him sex. It’s why we go to “slut” and “whore” as our default insults — we’re not mad that women enjoy sex. We’re mad that women are distributing to other people the sex that they owed us.

Yes, the women in these stories are being portrayed as wonderful and beautiful and perfect. But remember, there are two ways to dehumanize someone: by dismissing them, and by idolizing them.

Photos.com
“Careful, you’ll make my tie smell like whore, ‘friend.’”

Which brings us to the next problem …

#4. We’re Trained from Birth to See You as Decoration

Photos.com

I’m not saying there’s anything wrong with putting a pretty girl on the cover of a magazine or posing her next to a shiny new car. The pretty girl gets a good job, men want her, women want to be her, everybody is happy. Right?

The problem is that it goes way deeper than that.


“Brought to you by the American Corn Farmers Association.”

From my experience, if there is a fundamental difference between male and female sexuality, it’s this: There are actual occasions where women aren’t thinking about sex. Here, let me show you an extreme example. I’m going to quote a Free Republic thread again, because I quite frankly can’t stop reading them. These are some comments they made about a female public figure, and I want you to guess who it is:

“Her face is so ugly you can smash it into some dough and make gorilla cookies.”

“So fugly, I’d say ‘don’t even look’!!!”

“At least Medusa was modestly attractive by comparison.”

“This person is disgusting and I would never trust ‘it’s’ opinion on ANYTHING!”

Have you guessed? They’re talking about Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.

Via Wikipedia
A woman who didn’t just graduate from Harvard Law — she became the fucking dean.

Yes, even in that setting, when judging a female for a position on the highest court in the land, our instinct is still to judge her suitability as a sex partner. It’s the first thing we notice. And you could just write that off as a bunch of douches being shallow, but then you have to realize how all of society has conformed to this. Forget about objectification in the media or fashion industry — go to a diner, they’ve got the pretty girl waiting tables. Go to a department store, they’ll have a pretty girl selling you pants.

See, that’s the difference. With men, there are some scenarios where it stops mattering how he looks. With women, it always matters. In a comedy movie, the male wacky sidekick can be the chubby Zach Galifianakis or the nearly deformed Steve Buscemi. But if the female wacky sidekick isn’t attractive, like the overweight Melissa McCarthy in Bridesmaids, then every scene needs to be about how ugly and fat and mannish she is. That has to be the core of her character.

Photos.com
“You mean there’s other things in the world besides food? Surely you jest.”

Her role in society or level of accomplishment doesn’t matter. Even if she’s a damned candidate for the Supreme Court, the female always has a dual role: to function as a person, and to act as decor.

And we get pissed if she doesn’t do her job. Check out any article about a female celebrity who has gained weight. Here’s literally the first one I found on Google, a blog post about how fat Christina Aguilera has gotten. Check the comments:

“fuck her! I have a full-time job, go to grad school full-time, cook at home every night and still find time to get my ass to the gym. lazy ass fat bitch …”

Don’t get me wrong — if it’s a male celebrity in the article, you’ll get lots of people making fun of his fatness. If it’s a female, you get anger.

Getty
That’s her, two months ago, by the way. How dare that fucking bitch?

She owes it to us to be pretty. That’s the social contract as we’ve understood it from the time we were toddlers.

And it’s a no-win situation. We hate you if you’re ugly; if you’re pretty, then …

#3. We Think You’re Conspiring With Our Boners to Ruin Us

Photos.com

… aka, Why Do You Think the Garden of Eden Story Has a Snake?

First, you need to understand something about the unique love/hate relationship men have with their penises.

Do you remember that story about police having to free a guy who got his dick stuck while humping a pool filter? Or that other guy who got stuck humping a park bench, or the other guy who got stuck humping a picnic table? Or that judge who got caught jerking off while on the bench listening to testimony?

Photos.com
“Do me a solid and bring that one chick with the huge boobs back up to testify.”

You see this type of story come up a lot — check your local police blotter. And they all have something in common: They’re all guys.

Seriously, do a Google search for “masturbating in public library.” Notice something in common with all of those stories? They’re all dudes. Obviously I’m not saying women don’t pleasure themselves (every single study would prove me a liar); I’m saying that men are far, far more likely to engage in extremely high-risk masturbation in public. They’re more likely to do it at work, and they’re more likely to do it in situations where they could go to jail.

No, it’s not some rare, weird exhibitionist fetish, either. It’s that they can’t even wait the couple of hours it’d take to do it safely at home.


It’s why we refer to the IT guy as “cockblocker.”

It makes absolutely no sense. All calculation of risk goes out the window. Why?

It’s because, in males more so than females, the sex drive is completely detached from the rest of the personality. The part of the male brain that worries about job security or money or social reputation or legal consequences has almost no veto power over the sex drive. You’ve heard guys say they were “thinking with their dick” or “I was thinking with the little brain” or “I took an order from Captain Bonerhelmet.” That’s what they’re referring to.

Science doesn’t seem to totally understand why the “base urges” part of the brain reacts differently in men. Maybe it’s just a matter of having 10 times as much testosterone in their system, or maybe society has trained us to be like this, or maybe we’re all spoiled children. My theory is that evolution needs males who will stay horny even in times of crisis or distress, and thus cuts off the brain’s ability to tamp down those urges. Whatever — nailing down the cause isn’t the point. The point is that a man can be giving the eulogy at his own grandmother’s funeral, and if there is a girl in the front row showing cleavage, he will be imagining himself pressing those boobs in his face, with his own dead grandmother not five feet away.

Photos.com
“And that’s why I know that grandma is boobing down on our cleavage today in this titties time.”

When that happens, when we get that boner at the funeral, we get mad at the girl showing the cleavage. Because we, ourselves, our own rational personality that knows right from wrong and appropriate from inappropriate, knows this is a bad place to get a boner. So it comes off like cleavage girl is conspiring with our penis to screw us over.

Is that a crazy thing to think? Yep! That’s why it’s so frustrating, especially if you don’t have a whole lot of emotional maturity, and grew up with male role models who had even less.

No, this doesn’t excuse anything. Obviously, “She was asking for it!” is still a bullshit rape defense. All I’m saying is when you see guys actually get annoyed or angry at the sight of a girl showing too much skin, or if you see them eager to degrade or humiliate the girls at the strip club, this is why. It’s probably why some Muslims make their women cover themselves head to toe.

Photos.com
“Where’s your eye drape? You trying to get us arrested?”

And in the Bible, it’s Eve who tempts Adam to sin … by conspiring with a snake.

Every male reading this is going to think I’m belaboring the obvious (after all, the world is full of comedy bits like this one about how hot girls are almost demonic in their ability to control males against their will). But I have never explained this to a woman who didn’t look at me like I was insisting that all men are secretly werewolves.

But even this isn’t the thing that makes us angriest …

Yeah, pretty much..although some of these (excuses) only applies to the average unaware slob, and not to intelligent insightful people.

7

..

If Common Sense Was Used in Government and the U.S.

  • Citizen: I don't believe in abortion.
  • Government: Then don't get one.
  • Citizen: I don't believe in birth control.
  • Government: You don't have to use it.
  • Citizen: I think gay marriage is a sin.
  • Government: Don't marry the same sex then.
  • Citizen: I want my kids to learn about creationism.
  • Government: Take them to church.

On the night of 27 July, shortly before midnight, 739 aircraft attacked Hamburg. The unusually dry and warm weather, the concentration of the bombing in one area, and firefighting limitations due to Blockbuster bombs used in the early part of the raid culminated in the so-called “Feuersturm” (firestorm). The tornadic fire created a huge inferno with winds of up to 240 km/h (150 mph) reaching temperatures of 800 °C (1,500 °F) and altitudes in excess of 1,000 feet, incinerating more than eight square miles (21 km²) of the city. Asphalt streets burst into flame, and fuel oil from damaged and destroyed ships, barges, and storage tanks spilled into the waters of the canals and the harbor caused it to ignite as well. The majority of deaths attributed to Operation ‘Gomorrah’ occurred on this night. A large number of those killed died seeking safety in bomb shelters and cellars, the firestorm consuming all available oxygen in the burning city above.

Operation Gomorrah (via rhea137)

I think of this when people talk about civilian casualties in modern warfare

(via rhea137)

lambanajib:

musafeer:

faineemae:


unbearable-light
:

OK now, i dont agree with this, i believe that the islamic religion preaches hate, war, fights and abuse to women.

yes not every Muslim is a terrorist, but in recent studies it has shown that every terrorist is a Muslim.
and i stand by that!

Hey Susan, let me tell you a story.

It’s about this girl who believed in a couple of recent studies that had shown that “every terrorist is a Muslim” and let me tell you about those bullshit recent studies. Just about 24% of terrorist/violence acts have been committed by Extreme left wing groups.  The Islamophobes like you claim that Islam is intrinsically a terrorist religion. The proof they supply?  ”Every Terrorist has been Muslim!” they retort.  Unfortunately for you, that’s not quite true, more like 6% percent.  Then we also have that about 7% of terror attacks in the US have been committed by Jewish Extremists in the United States. Now, if you don’t believe my information, you can just click right here. It will lead you to the  FBI website where it will give you the facts about terror attacks in the United States from 2000-2005 which was pretty much the time when all this began.

Let me show you some more things too:

The word “Islam” is closely related to the word “salam or silm” which means peace. Muhammad, sallallahu alayhe wa sallam, himself had a very peaceful nature, was extremely tolerant, and highly protective of the non-Muslim minorities living in the Muslim state.

A Muslim is never allowed to initiate hostilities. “And fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but transgress not the limits. Surely, Allah likes not the transgressors.” [2: 190]

I hope you liked my story and you learned something valuable today.

(Emphasis mine.) 

Hahahahahahahahah in yo’ face.

All of the above is bullshit. The difference is that the extreme christian crasies aren’t making making national policy. When the head of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_Church (the people protesting soldiers’ funerals) is president, then this comparison holds a little water. Judaism, Christian and Muslim…all of the desert dogmas that sprang from Abraham are shit and result in human misery overall. Further Mohammad was a pedofile, rapist and murderer. The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers.  Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding.  Muslims who do not join the fight are called ‘hypocrites’ and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

Unlike nearly all of the Old Testament verses of violence, most of the verses of violence in the Quran are open-ended, meaning that they are not restrained by the historical context of the surrounding text.  They are part of the eternal, unchanging word of Allah, and just as relevant or subjective as anything else in the Quran.  

Unfortunately, there are very few verses of tolerance and peace to abrogate or even balance out the many that call for nonbelievers to be fought and subdued until they either accept humiliation, convert to Islam, or are killed.  Muhammad’s own martial legacy and the remarkable stress on violence found in the Quran have resulted in a trail of blood and tears across world history

(Source: prettyindian, via mafrommilwaukee)

More science fiction becomes science fact
Using data from NASA’s Kepler mission, a team that includes a  University of Florida astronomer has discovered two new planets orbiting  double star systems, something that had never been seen until last  September.
The newly confirmed planets, called Kepler-34b and Kepler-35b, will be announced in Wednesday’s online edition of the journal Nature,  said Eric B. Ford, UF associate professor of astronomy. William F.  Welsh, associate professor at San Diego State University, is the lead  author on the paper.
Kepler-34b and Kepler-35b both orbit a “binary star.” They are actually a pair of gravitationally bound stars that orbit each other. While the existence of such bodies, called  “circumbinary planets,” had long been predicted, they remained just a  theory until the team discovered Kepler-16b in September 2011. They  dubbed Kepler-16b “Tatooine” because of its resemblance to the two-sun  world depicted in the “Star Wars” film series.
 Enlarge
This  is an artist’s rendition of the Kepler-35 planet system, in which a  Saturn-size planet orbits a pair of stars. The larger star is similar to  the size of the Sun, while the smaller star is 79 percent of the Sun’s  radius. The stars orbit and eclipse each other every 21 days, but the  eclipses do not occur exactly periodically. This variation in the times  of the eclipses motivated the search for the planet, which was  discovered to transit the stars as it orbits the pair every 131 days.  Analogous events led to the discovery of the planet Kepler-34. The  discovery of these two new systems establishes a new class of  ‘circumbinary’ planets, and suggests there are many millions of such  giant planets in our Galaxy. Credit: Mark A. Garlick
“We have long  believed these kinds of planets to be possible, but they have been very  difficult to detect for various technical reasons,” Ford said. “With the  discoveries of Kepler-16b, 34b and 35b, the Kepler mission has shown  that the galaxy abounds with millions of planets orbiting two stars.”
The planets were discovered by measuring the star light decrease as  the planets pass in front of, or transit, either of the two stars.  Kepler also measures the star light decrease when one of the stars  passes in front of the other. The mutual gravitational tugs of the stars  and planets cause the times of the transits to deviate from a regular  schedule, allowing astronomers to confirm the planet and measure its  mass.
Both planets are low-density gas giants,  comparable in size to Jupiter, but much less massive. Compared to  Jupiter, Kepler-34 is about 24 percent smaller in size, but has 78  percent less mass. It can complete a full orbit in 288 terrestrial days.  Kepler-35 is about 26 percent smaller, has 88 percent less mass, and  completes its orbit around the stars much faster – just 131 days.

The astronomers believe the planets are made primarily of hydrogen and too hot to sustain life.
“Circumbinary planets can have much more complex climates, since the  distance between the planet and each star change significantly during  each orbital period, the length of an alien planet’s year,” Ford said.  “For Kepler-35b, the amount of incoming star light changes by over 50  percent within a single Earth year. For Kepler-34b, each Earth-year  brings ‘summers’ with 2.3 times as much star light as winters. Over the  course of a year, the change in the amount of sunlight heating the Earth  varies by only 6 percent.”
 Enlarge
This  is an artist’s rendition of the Kepler-35 planet system, in which a  Saturn-size planet orbits a pair of stars. The larger star is similar to  the size of the Sun, while the smaller star is 79 percent of the Sun’s  radius. The stars orbit and eclipse each other every 21 days, but the  eclipses do not occur exactly periodically. This variation in the times  of the eclipses motivated the search for the planet, which was  discovered to transit the stars as it orbits the pair every 131 days.  Analogous events led to the discovery of the planet Kepler-34. The  discovery of these two new systems establishes a new class of  `circumbinary’ planets, and suggests there are many millions of such  giant planets in our Galaxy. Credit: Illustration by Lior Taylor
NASA’s  Kepler mission, which began in March 2009, uses a 1-meter space  telescope trained on one small portion of the Milky Way for several  years. Astronomers analyze data from the telescope for periodic dimming  that indicates a planet crossing in front of its host star. The  mission’s goal is to find the frequency of Earth-size planets in the  habitable zone of their host stars – where a planet might have liquid  water on its surface.
Most Sun-like stars in the galaxy are not alone, like the Earth’s  sun, but have a “dance partner,” forming a binary system or binary star.  Kepler has already identified about 2,165 eclipsing binaries, of the  more than 160,000 stars being observed.
NASA originally planned to stop receiving data from the Kepler spacecraft in November 2012.
“Astronomers are practically begging NASA to extend the Kepler mission until 2016, so it can characterize the masses and orbits of Earth-size planets in the habitable zone. Kepler is revolutionizing so many fields, not  just planetary science,” Ford said. “It would be a shame not to maximize  the scientific return of this great observatory. Hopefully common sense  will prevail and the mission will continue.”

More science fiction becomes science fact

Using data from NASA’s Kepler mission, a team that includes a University of Florida astronomer has discovered two new planets orbiting double star systems, something that had never been seen until last September.

The newly confirmed planets, called Kepler-34b and Kepler-35b, will be announced in Wednesday’s online edition of the journal Nature, said Eric B. Ford, UF associate professor of astronomy. William F. Welsh, associate professor at San Diego State University, is the lead author on the paper.

Kepler-34b and Kepler-35b both orbit a “binary star.” They are actually a pair of gravitationally bound stars that orbit each other. While the existence of such bodies, called “circumbinary planets,” had long been predicted, they remained just a theory until the team discovered Kepler-16b in September 2011. They dubbed Kepler-16b “Tatooine” because of its resemblance to the two-sun world depicted in the “Star Wars” film series.

Kepler discovery establishes new class of planetary systems
Enlarge

This is an artist’s rendition of the Kepler-35 planet system, in which a Saturn-size planet orbits a pair of stars. The larger star is similar to the size of the Sun, while the smaller star is 79 percent of the Sun’s radius. The stars orbit and eclipse each other every 21 days, but the eclipses do not occur exactly periodically. This variation in the times of the eclipses motivated the search for the planet, which was discovered to transit the stars as it orbits the pair every 131 days. Analogous events led to the discovery of the planet Kepler-34. The discovery of these two new systems establishes a new class of ‘circumbinary’ planets, and suggests there are many millions of such giant planets in our Galaxy. Credit: Mark A. Garlick

“We have long believed these kinds of planets to be possible, but they have been very difficult to detect for various technical reasons,” Ford said. “With the discoveries of Kepler-16b, 34b and 35b, the Kepler mission has shown that the galaxy abounds with millions of planets orbiting two stars.”

The planets were discovered by measuring the star light decrease as the planets pass in front of, or transit, either of the two stars. Kepler also measures the star light decrease when one of the stars passes in front of the other. The mutual gravitational tugs of the stars and planets cause the times of the transits to deviate from a regular schedule, allowing astronomers to confirm the planet and measure its mass.

Both planets are low-density gas giants, comparable in size to Jupiter, but much less massive. Compared to Jupiter, Kepler-34 is about 24 percent smaller in size, but has 78 percent less mass. It can complete a full orbit in 288 terrestrial days. Kepler-35 is about 26 percent smaller, has 88 percent less mass, and completes its orbit around the stars much faster – just 131 days.

The astronomers believe the planets are made primarily of hydrogen and too hot to sustain life.

“Circumbinary planets can have much more complex climates, since the distance between the planet and each star change significantly during each orbital period, the length of an alien planet’s year,” Ford said. “For Kepler-35b, the amount of incoming star light changes by over 50 percent within a single Earth year. For Kepler-34b, each Earth-year brings ‘summers’ with 2.3 times as much star light as winters. Over the course of a year, the change in the amount of sunlight heating the Earth varies by only 6 percent.”

Kepler discovery establishes new class of planetary systems
Enlarge

This is an artist’s rendition of the Kepler-35 planet system, in which a Saturn-size planet orbits a pair of stars. The larger star is similar to the size of the Sun, while the smaller star is 79 percent of the Sun’s radius. The stars orbit and eclipse each other every 21 days, but the eclipses do not occur exactly periodically. This variation in the times of the eclipses motivated the search for the planet, which was discovered to transit the stars as it orbits the pair every 131 days. Analogous events led to the discovery of the planet Kepler-34. The discovery of these two new systems establishes a new class of `circumbinary’ planets, and suggests there are many millions of such giant planets in our Galaxy. Credit: Illustration by Lior Taylor

NASA’s Kepler mission, which began in March 2009, uses a 1-meter space telescope trained on one small portion of the Milky Way for several years. Astronomers analyze data from the telescope for periodic dimming that indicates a planet crossing in front of its host star. The mission’s goal is to find the frequency of Earth-size planets in the habitable zone of their host stars – where a planet might have liquid water on its surface.

Most Sun-like stars in the galaxy are not alone, like the Earth’s sun, but have a “dance partner,” forming a binary system or binary star. Kepler has already identified about 2,165 eclipsing binaries, of the more than 160,000 stars being observed.

NASA originally planned to stop receiving data from the Kepler spacecraft in November 2012.

“Astronomers are practically begging NASA to extend the Kepler mission until 2016, so it can characterize the masses and orbits of Earth-size planets in the habitable zone. Kepler is revolutionizing so many fields, not just planetary science,” Ford said. “It would be a shame not to maximize the scientific return of this great observatory. Hopefully common sense will prevail and the mission will continue.”

Gamers get hella uncomfortable over male sexuality too. Can you imagine a “good male character who just happens to be wearing sexually exploitative outfits because he’s ok with his masculinity?” Constantly has the camera pan lovingly over his asscrack and firm glutes, and big ole dangly ballsack that is totes sweaty from all this MMA and soldiering. Time to hit the showers, and do you, personally, think it’s ok to have a long slow pan up the dude’s package (indiscreetly hidden in a jock of course), to his chiseled physique and erect nipples (pierced). He’s not even a Bond-esque confident man, he’s basically a weird Bowie caricature that’s constantly having near-dickslips in every single cinematic as the completely nonsexualized female characters do their business of being gruff and shooting dudes and advancing the plot. Finally, at the end he falls in love (out of nowhere) and/or is killed by the big baddie.

a forum post I read recently, trying to give a solid example of what ‘male objectification in gaming ’ would actually look like if it was anything equivalent to current female objectification in gaming. (via nothingbutsurrender)

-Twyst-> This reminds me of the Futurama episode where Fry becomes a police officer and the chief is a woman, and they switch all the cop-talk from male-focused, to female.  

CLIP:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJ44jKIZOgg

(via twyst)

meh never happen. Video games are visual in nature. Women are not stimulated as visually as men (in general). It would not sell. If you want many awful and unfair examples of male objectification, read a “romance novel” sometime…not that I give a shit, I am just sayin’.

(via quantumstarlight)

Top